|
THE
BOOK OF ACTORS OF TGV PROVENCE CÔTE D'AZUR ASSOCIATION,
LYING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PUBLIC DISCUSSION
WHICH WILL BE HELD DURING THE FIRST HALF OF 2005
The association was created at the beginning of the
year 2003 to revive a project which had been almost
abandoned for 10 years. Its interventions near the
authorities were determining. From its constitution,
its objective to gather actors who, in the past, had
not spoken with one voice, which had been one of the
reasons that made itself late. It thanks the State
for having prescribed to RFF to initiate the first
procedures and to accelerate the studies. This book
of actors endeavours to make a synthesis of the concerns
of its members, elected officials and representatives
professional. It is based on the last year work which
led to the edition of a small volume in French, Italian
and Spanish languages, to the drafting of a White
Paper that will be published from the very start of
the public discussion, and to the constitution of
a file interreg with Catalonia and Ligurie, intended
to prepare the line inscription in 2007 in the European
priorities.
From debates we had inside our authorities and contacts
we took in the field, we draw the following conclusions.
The future TGV Provence Côte d'Azur will have to constitute
a response to the following concerns :
1/ The connection with Paris. The most penalized city
is obviously Nice, and it is quite normal that the
revival movement of the file came from this part of
the regional territory. For the trains carrying out
the Paris-Nice way without stop, the margin of variation
of the course durations, according to the various
assumptions of layouts, should not exceed ten minutes.
2/ The studies must take into account the geographical
specificity of this part of our own territory : Whereas
the already built TGV cross, most of the time, little
populated zones, with a little animated relief, the
TGV Provence Côte d'Azur will move, in all its length,
in very dense territories, ecologically significant
zones and important reliefs. Two of these cities,
Marseilles and Nice, are metropolises with European
dimension, which is not the case in any other area
; a third, Toulon, plays a major part on the Mediterranean
frontage of the European Union. Those who will enjoy
this new connection to go in the area or to move outside,
will be numerous to borrow the stations, whatever
their position on the route. It is not the case for
any other existing line TGV. The stops site and the
trains clocking constitute a major problem. The future
users, whatever their destination or starting place,
will wish to profit very strongly decreased courses
time. Add to that the demographic dynamism, the highest
of all France, which will strongly increase the request
for transport in the future in this area.
3/ The area is the first French tourist destination.
One comes there from Paris, from most French areas,
but also from Asia and America by plane, from all
East and Northern Europe by our TGV ways, and, in
the future, by the large European railway crossroads
that Milan will be. Very high speed in Provence Côte
d'Azur will be gradually as fundamental for the travellers
coming from Italy, or forwarding by this country,
as for those which borrow our national network. Which
that means that our large metropolises : Marseilles,
Toulon, Nice as well as the other important cities
of the littoral of Provence and the Riviera, must
be able to be accessible at very high speed as much
for the travellers coming from North and the East
forwarding by Italy, that for those which are taken
into account in the specifically French studies. The
course duration between Milan and Marseilles, between
Milan and Toulon, between Milan and Nice, must be
as short as possible for the competitiveness of our
coast compared to other destinations. That is true
for tourism but also for the dynamism of the university
towns and congress of the area.
4/ The area has two international airports, Marseilles
and Nice, and an airport which can develop flights
charters, Toulon Hyères. The idea to build a third
airport close to Cannet des Maures, as certain documents
of Datar suggest it, is not realistic. The new connection
must contribute to the good routing of passengers,
coming from the whole world, towards their various
places of stay in our area. Express trains with the
judiciously selected schedules could be of major interest
for the organizers of voyages. Countries as different
as Norway or China were resolutely directed in this
direction. In the same way, the very strong density
of population on all the route, the existence of motorways
whose geography, appreciably the very one, allows
a fast relation between the residence and the station,
can ensure the profitability of fast. The stops site
and the connection points between the new line and
the lines existing today are fundamental questions.
The taking into account of the favourable elements
to a diversified use of the line will play an important
part in the balance of exploitation.
5/ Today the absence of a fast rail link in our area
limits the exchanges, along the Mediterranean, between
the Iberian peninsula on the one hand, France, Italy,
old Yugoslavia, Greece... on the other hand. The air
links are today, on these routes, rare and very expensive.
The Lyon-Turin project has initially the role to transport
freight. The TGV Provence Côte d'Azur project will
play a similar part for the travellers, it will consolidate
the unit of the South of Europe and will develop exchanges
of all natures. The strategic place in the South of
Europe the territory of Provence and the Riviera will
have, in particular these cities : Marseilles, Toulon,
Nice, but also Draguignan, Fréjus, Saint-Raphaël,
Cannes, Grasse, as well as the principality of Monaco,
must constitute a powerful lever of economic development,
intellectual, cultural and social progress. Growing
points, like Château Gombert and Sophia Antipolis,
will be able, better than today, to tie alliances
with entities located in Catalonia or in North of
Italy. The file interreg, initiated by Association
TGV Provence Côte d'Azur, is testimony ; it received
immediately, and without reserve, the support of the
areas of Ligurie and Catalonia which included/understood
how much this project offered for them new openings.
It is advisable to note the efforts carried out, as
well on the Spanish side as of that of Italy, to be
located within a framework at European dimension :
construction of ways in Spain with the standards in
force in the other European countries prolonged by
the Perpignan-Figuéras connection, complete restoration
of the rail network of Italy of North in synergy with
the alpine openings of Switzerland and Austria. It
is enough to consult a map to measure how much the
180 kilometers ways which France will have to build,
will be the key to success of this gigantic work and
how much their not-construction would penalize our
area and would weigh on the image of the South of
France abroad.
|

|
|
|
|
 |
These various considerations had not been the subject
of an examination 15 years ago, when it was a question
of continuing the TGV Méditerranée to Saint-Raphaël,
this is why the association members require RFF integrates
in its studies the data above and to show imagination
in research of the solutions to be proposed :
1/ The three big cities of the area, Marseilles, Toulon
and Nice, must be disenclosed on the French side,
Spanish side and Italian side. On the French side,
the relation with the capital city is essential, Marseilles
is well served today, Nice very badly, and Toulon
poorly. Nice needs TGV, direct and without stop, with
Paris which slow down as less as possible between
the future station of Saint-Augustin and the station
of Lyon. Toulon, which is geographically close to
Marseilles, must be able to profit from a time of
course not very higher than that of the time of Marseilles-Saint-Charles
in Paris, the maximum use of the new infrastructure
should allow it.
On the Spanish side, much remains to be made. Spain
engaged in a construction industry of TGV lines breaking
with the spacing specific to this country. The construction
of the Perpignan-Figuéras section is a progress, but
the investments to be realized in the Languedoc-Roussillon
area only are very partially registered in Ciat of
December 13, 2003. The Catalans ask it with insistence
because they believe deeply in the positive economic
effects of an axis of rail-bound transports along
the Mediterranean.
On the Italian side, Marseilles is the most penalized,
it is necessary that the Marseilles-Nice trains, being
prolonged towards Gènes and Milan, have a time of
course between Marseilles and Nice limited to the
maximum, which poses the problem of the positioning
of TGV line compared to Marseilles and the advisability
of integrating this question in the studies subjected
to the public discussion. It is necessary also to
allow a good connection between TGV network and the
Airport of Marignane so that the stations under consideration
along the course, in particular that of the Arcs which
serves the Peninsula of Saint-Tropez, can be served
by express trains conveying the foreigners arriving
by plane. It is also the interest of the littoral
located between Cassis and Toulon. This last city
needs, on the East side, good connections with Italy
to profit from the railway hub from Milan, that is
fundamental to break its relative current insulation
which slows down the results of its initiatives. That
means that its connection on the East side on TGV
line must be as close as possible of its agglomeration,
around Cuers. As for Nice, it is advisable to build
the new line up to a point of connection with the
existing line which is as close as possible station
of Saint-Augustin, to do this one a multimode station,
a major point of international connection thanks to
the plane and to improve the course time with Vintimille,
which will be from now on the assemblage point with
the Italian fast lines. But as those will not have,
between Gènes and Vintimille, that a block speed of
160 kilometers per hour, one can pose as principle
which the Nice-Vintimille course will not have need
to be carried out at the TGV speed, which reduces
the cost of the investments to be carried out. One
could imagine a new connection between East-Nice and
Monaco with a tunnel near the principality with the
image of what exists, since a few years for the motorway,
the remainder being the object, mainly, of work of
modernization, in particular in the crossing of Nice
whose avoidance would be financially prohibitory.
Beyond these international questions, it is advisable
to consider the relation with the TGV of all the localities
located along the course, which they are on the littoral
or more inside and to allow trains which will have
objectives of performances much higher than those
which currently exist, to penetrate on the new line
or to leave it to use the existing line in several
quite selected places. From West to East, one finds
successively the urbanization lain between Marseilles
and Toulon. The service road by motorway makes the
most important communes, with some improvements of
road roadway system, accessible at less than one half
an hour of stations TGV of the Arbois and Toulon,
which is reasonable for the long distances in railroad.
Beyond Toulon, the coastal part preceding the solid
mass by the Maures remains in the orbit of this city
and can be served by its station or Hyères. The East
of Var, very populated and very attended by the tourists
of the whole world, needs a station. That of the Arcs,
located already on the layout of last century, constitutes
one of the major assets of the TGV : duration of course
with Paris very close to that of Toulon, possibility
of express trains with the three international airports,
proximity of the motorway, grounds available for the
establishment of logistic zones, new installations
for the TGV postal, connection with the existing ways
to serve the towns of Frejus and Saint-Raphaël. For
the Alpes-Maritimes, a connection with the traditional
way in Cannes-Mandelieu of the TGV way which continues
in exclusive right of way until the accesses of Nice,
makes it possible to serve well Cannes, Grasse and
Antibes, the localities closer to Nice being pressed
on the new station of Saint-Augustin. Construction
between East-Nice and Monaco of a new way with a tunnel
like that which was dug to connect the principality
to the motorway, would allow a valorisation of the
international airport of Nice and would facilitate
the circulation of trains of freight coming from Italy.
This last subject constitutes a supported request
of the Chamber of Commerce of Genes. Association considers
that the new line to Nice cannot undoubtedly accommodate
the goods trains. Beyond, the question deserves to
be asked.
All these observations must find their place in the
analysis of the forecasts of traffic. This one will
not be the same one according to functionalities taken
into account. The cost of the various layouts will
be naturally variable, but certain prospects for growth
of traffic, related to an intelligent design of the
layout, stations and trains clocking, can attenuate
the additional loads related to expensive works. These
elements will have to be analysed when are tackled
the questions of financing with, if necessary, a careful
thought on what could bring, in the circumstance,
a public-private partnership. The foreign experiments
are today sufficiently many so that this subject is
tackled usefully. Association already appealed, for
this reason, with specialists in the subject before
the decision of Ciat of December 13, 2003. Their studies,
were at the time given to the services of the State
and were useful for the decision-making. They concluded
positively. Their contents were inevitably summary,
the various constraints of the file not having been
highlighted, but it was a good starting point. The
results of the public discussion must make it possible
to bring up to date these studies. The association
whose objective is the fastest realization of the
new infrastructure, will take an active share with
these reflexions during later stages of the project.
|
|